المقاصد وتحديات الحداثة
Keywords:islamic jurisprudence, maqasid, modernization, maslaha
AbstractA central feature of public Muslim discourse over the past three decades has been the call to restore the shari‘a in one form or another. Some reformers have proposed a new theoretical underpinning for this restoration, arguing for the adoption of foundational concepts that bear little, if any, resemblance to their pre-modern counterparts. A central question that ineluctably emerges in this aporia is: What narrative must be adopted as the representation of the historical shari‘a, the shari‘a that prevailed until the early portion of the nineteenth century? If the colonial narrative is ipso facto programmatic and teleological, and if it served and still serves the purposes of all but those of the subaltern majority, then what other narrative must be adopted in the project of creating the new symbiosis? And if the jural voices of the subaltern are to come in for serious consideration, then how are we to represent them, if we can at all? And if we cannot, then into what espistemic predicament, if not a perennial aporia, does this throw both the privileged scholar and the reformer/ intellectual? This article does not provide answers to these questions but rather addresses the problematics that these and related questions raise in dealing with the challenge of introducing into the modern Muslim condition one form of Islamic law or another.
Abou-El-Haj, R. (1991) Formation of the Modern State: The Ottoman Empire, Sixteenth to Eighteenth Centuries, Albany: State University of New York Press.
Al-Ghazali, A. H. (1390/1971) Shifa’ al-Ghalil fi Bayan al-Shabah wal-Mukhil wa Masalik al-Ta‘lil. Baghdad: Matba‘at al-Irshad.
----, (1324/1906). Al-Mustasfa min ‘Ilm al-Usul, 2 vols., Cairo: al-Matba‘a al-Amiriyya.
Al-Mawardi, ‘A b. M. (1983). Al-Ahkam al-Sultaniyya, Cairo: Dar al-Fikr.
al-Nawawi, A. Z. Y. b. S. E. (n.d.). Rawdat al-Talibin, in ‘Adi, ‘Abd al-Mawjud (eds.), 8 vols., Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyya,.
Al-Sam‘ani, A. A. M b. M. (1997). Qawati‘ al-Adilla fil-Usul, 2 vols., Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyya.
Al-Shatibi, A. I. (1970). Muhyi al-Din ‘Abd al-Hamid (ed.), 4 vols., Cairo: Matba‘at ‘Ali Muhammad Subayh.
Al-Shawkani, M. b. ‘A. (n.d.) Irshad al-Fuhul ila Tahqiq al-Haqq min ‘Ilm al-Usul, Surabaya: Sharikat Maktabat Ahmad b. Sa‘id b. Nabhan.
Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid Modernity, Oxford: Polity Press.
Bayitch, S. A. (1965). “Codification in Modern Times,” in A. N. Yiannopoulos (ed.), Civil Law in the Modern World, Kingsport: Louisiana State University Press.
Cammack, M. (2002) “Islamic Inheritance Law in Indonesia: The Influence of Hazairin’s Theory of Bilateral Inheritance,” The Australian Journal of Asian Law, 4 (3), 295-315.
Chatterjee, P. (1989). “Colonialism, Nationalism, and Colonized Women: The Contest in India,” American Ethnologist, 16 (4), 622-633.
Creveld, M. v. (1999). The Rise and Decline of the State, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dube, M., (2002). “Postcolonial, Feminist Spaces, and Religion,” in L. E. Donaldson and K. Pui-lan, eds., Postcolonialism, Feminism, and Religious Discourse, New York: Routledge.
Eickelman, D. (1993). “Islamic Liberalism Strikes Back,” Middle East Studies Association Bulletin, 27(2), 163-168.
Fadel, M. (1996). “The Social Logic of Taqlid and the Rise of the Mukhtasar,” Islamic Law and Society, 3, 2. 193-233.
Foucault M. (1995). Discipline and Punish: The Bith of the Prison, trans. Alan Sheridan, New York: Vintage Books.
Giddens, A. (1990). The Consequences of Modernity, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Hallaq, W. B. (2003-2004), “Juristic Authority vs. State Power: The Legal Crises of Modern Islam,” Journal of Law and Religion, 19, 2. 243-258.
----, (1997). A History of Islamic Legal Theories, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
----, (2001). Authority, Continuity, and Change in Islamic Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
----, (2009). Shari‘a: Theory, Practice, Transformations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lassman, P. (2000) “The Rule of Man Over Man: Politics, Power and Legitimation,” in Stephen Turner (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Weber, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lyotard, J. F. (1985). The Post-Modern Condition, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Marlow, L. (1997). Hierarchy and Egalitarianism in Islamic Thought, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Merry, S. (1988). “Legal Pluralism,” Law and Society Review, 22, 5.
Mohanty, C. T., (1994). “Under Western Eyes: Feminist Scholarship and Colonial Discourse,” in P. Williams and l. Chrisman, eds., Colonial Discourse and Post-colonial Theory: A Reader. New York: Columbia University Press.
Narayan, U. (2004). “The Project of Feminist Epistemology: Perspectives from a Non-western Feminist,” in S. Harding, (ed.), The Feminist Standpoint Theory Reader, London: Routledge.
Nielsen, J. (1985). Secular Justice in an Islamic State, Leiden: NedelandsHistorisch Archaeologisch Instituut,
Qutb, S. (2003). Milestones, Cedar Rapids: The Mother Mosque Foundation.
Rabinow, P. (ed.), (1984). The Foucault Reader, New York: Pantheon Books,
Singha, R. (1998). Despotism of Law: Crime and Justice in Early Colonial India, Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Sonn, T., (1991). “Fazlur Rahman’s Islamic Methodology,” Muslim World, 81(3‐4), 212-230.
Spivak, G. C., (1994). “Can the Subaltern Speak?” in Patrick Williams and Laura Chrisman, eds., Colonial Discourse and Post-Colonial Theory: A Reader, New York: Columbia University Press.
Stone, F. F., (1989). “A Primer on Codification,” Tulane Law Review, 29, 1954-55.
Wallerstein, I., (1974, 1980). The Modern World-System, vols. I and II, New York: Academic Press, vol. III, San Diego: Academic Press.
Weiss, B., (1992). The Search for God’s Law: Islamic Jurisprudence in the Writings of Sayf al-Din al-‘Amidi, Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.
Zarinebaf-Shahr, F., (1997). “Ottoman Women and the Tradition of Seeking Justice in the Eighteenth Century,” in M. Zelfi (ed.) Women in the Ottoman Empire, Leiden: Brill.
- 2022-07-31 (2)
- 2022-07-31 (1)
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2022 Journal of Contemporary Maqasid Studies
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.